vsapsai added a comment.
Herald added a subscriber: kadircet.

Thanks, Dmitry, for your explanation. It does help to understand your use case 
better.

What about having a mode that treats missing header as non-fatal error? Because 
I believe there are cases where there is no sense to continue after a fatal 
error. For example, consider hitting the error limit. Showing too many errors 
isn't useful and also after 50 errors it is a little bit too optimistic to 
assume that AST is in a good shape. I don't know if there are other 
fatal-but-we-can-continue errors and if we need a more general solution. So far 
looks like missing include is the biggest blocker for IDE-like functionality.


Repository:
  rC Clang

https://reviews.llvm.org/D50462



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to