atanasyan added inline comments.
================ Comment at: lib/Basic/Targets/Mips.cpp:141 + Twine(32 / (FPMode == FP64 || IsSingleFloat ? 1 : 2))); if (IsMips16) ---------------- What do you think about this variant of the code? It's longer, but imho looks more clear. ``` switch (FPMode) { case FPXX: Builder.defineMacro("__mips_fpr", Twine(0)); break; case FP32: Builder.defineMacro("__mips_fpr", Twine(32)); break; case FP64: Builder.defineMacro("__mips_fpr", Twine(64)); break; } if (FPMode == FP64 || IsSingleFloat) Builder.defineMacro("_MIPS_FPSET", Twine(32)); else Builder.defineMacro("_MIPS_FPSET", Twine(16)); ``` https://reviews.llvm.org/D50557 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits