Hahnfeld added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D50845#1202963, @hfinkel wrote:
> As a result, we should really have a separate header that has those > actually-available functions. When targeting NVPTX, why don't we have the > included math.h be CUDA's math.h? In the end, those are the functions we need > to call when we generate code. Right? That's what https://reviews.llvm.org/D47849 deals with. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D50845 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
