rnk added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D49240#1195733, @ldionne wrote:
> Ah, thanks a lot for taking a look! Yes, this makes a lot of sense, since now > we're not inlining everything anymore. So the code size is actually smaller > (-9.8%), but there's more symbols because more functions are emitted. In this > case, I would say this is expected, if unfortunate. Also, a similar effect > would probably be witnessed if Chromium were to change their standard library > to libstdc++, for example, since libstdc++ does not abuse inlining like > libc++ used to. I think if we used libstdc++, the situation would be much better because the inline functions would be linkonce_odr, and there would be far fewer symbols in the symbol table. We'd get code size wins from deduplicating the code, and symbol table size wins from dropping duplicate long mangled names. Repository: rCXX libc++ https://reviews.llvm.org/D49240 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
