vext01 added a comment. Hi,
I've been experimenting some more with this patch. It seems to me that if a label is optimised away, but you've requested it be preserved, then you get a DWARF label with a zero offset. Is that the expected behaviour? Should it be documented? E.g.: < 6><0x000000dc> DW_TAG_label DW_AT_name __YK_BLK_2_19418_0 DW_AT_low_pc 0x00000000 Thanks! Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D45045 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits