Rakete1111 added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp:6187
+ Record->dropAttr<TriviallyRelocatableAttr>();
+ } else if (Record->needsImplicitMoveConstructor() &&
+ Record->defaultedMoveConstructorIsDeleted()) {
----------------
Quuxplusone wrote:
> Rakete1111 wrote:
> > This is dead code. `Record` never needs an implicit move constructor at
> > this point, because either 1) it never did or 2) it was defined above by
> > `LookupSpecialMember`.
> Confirmed that this code is never hit; and removed. Just for my own
> information: you're saying that the call to `LookupSpecialMember` on line
> 6179, even though it's looking up the //destructor//, will actually cause all
> the `needsImplicitFootor` flags to get resolved? And so also I guess I should
> never have been looking at those flags directly; I should have handled this
> case by calling `LookupSpecialMember` like I do on line 6196. Is that
> basically correct?
No, not the 6179 one, but the one before it 6163. Yeah you could have :)
Repository:
rC Clang
https://reviews.llvm.org/D50119
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
