erichkeane added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D48100#1185189, @hfinkel wrote:
> Assuming that @aaron.ballman is still okay with this, I think that we should > move forward. @erichkeane, I suspect that fixing the ordering problems, which > were often arbitrary before and are still so, is a larger change that we'd > want to split out regardless (not to mention the fact that we'd need to > decide how to fix them). Erich, is that alright with you? That works fine with me. I'm still concerned about the ordering issues, since I think the error-on-the-second made more sense in the past, but after digging in for a bit, I think it is perhaps not worth the effort. I'm OK if @aaron.ballman is. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D48100 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
