On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 6:57 PM, David Blaikie <dblai...@gmail.com> wrote:
> (attachment missing)
>
(whoops. looks as expected though, here it is.)
Cursory review based on description: Sounds reasonable to me. Would want to
> check the C++98 behavior to ensure it is actually relevant/correct to imply
> the possibility of 'final' being used to fix the issue.
>
test.cc:1:9: warning: 'final' keyword is a C++11 extension
[-Wc++11-extensions]
class C final {};
^
>
> On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 1:37 AM, Nico Weber via cfe-commits <
> cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> the attached patch changes
>>
>> delete called on 'dnvd::B' that has virtual functions but non-virtual
>> destructor
>>
>> to
>>
>> delete called on non-final 'dnvd::B' that has virtual functions but
>> non-virtual destructor
>>
>> I'm not sure if it should only do this for c++11 and newer – the new
>> message is true in c++98 as well and I think we support final as an
>> extension in c++98. So this patch unconditionally changes the warning text.
>>
>> Nico
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cfe-commits mailing list
>> cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>>
>>
>
clang-finalnonvirt.patch
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
