On 1 December 2015 at 19:42, James Molloy <ja...@jamesmolloy.co.uk> wrote: > Why do you think it would be non trivial? Some simple lit tests aren't > exactly arduous on most targets.
I mean having more points in the testing matrix. Clang check-all is cheaper than running the test-suite, but if we start moving more tests to the suite, we'll have to run it for more combinations. For slow targets, that mostly means a new buildbot, because you want the "fast" check-all to not be impeded by the "slow" test-suite for every commit. The "non-trivial" amount is the sole difference in how many machines you can get to have a reasonable amount of commits in the blame-list for everything we test, which is trivial on fast x86_64 servers. --renato _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
