Possible to test (unit test?) the bug that GCC accidentally found here? On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Richard Smith via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Author: rsmith > Date: Tue Nov 24 20:41:42 2015 > New Revision: 254053 > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=254053&view=rev > Log: > Fix typo that was being SFINAE'd away (and apparently GCC 4.7.2 > rejects-valid on this). > > Modified: > cfe/trunk/include/clang/AST/RecursiveASTVisitor.h > > Modified: cfe/trunk/include/clang/AST/RecursiveASTVisitor.h > URL: > http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/include/clang/AST/RecursiveASTVisitor.h?rev=254053&r1=254052&r2=254053&view=diff > > ============================================================================== > --- cfe/trunk/include/clang/AST/RecursiveASTVisitor.h (original) > +++ cfe/trunk/include/clang/AST/RecursiveASTVisitor.h Tue Nov 24 20:41:42 > 2015 > @@ -291,10 +291,10 @@ private: > // class can take a queue, so if we're taking the second arm, make the > first > // arm call our function rather than the derived class version. > #define TRAVERSE_STMT_BASE(NAME, CLASS, VAR, QUEUE) > \ > - (decltype(callableWithQueue<CLASS *>(&Derived::Traverse##NAME))::value > \ > + (decltype(callableWithQueue<CLASS>(&Derived::Traverse##NAME))::value > \ > ? static_cast<typename std::conditional< > \ > decltype( > \ > - callableWithQueue<CLASS > *>(&Derived::Traverse##NAME))::value, \ > + > callableWithQueue<CLASS>(&Derived::Traverse##NAME))::value, \ > Derived &, RecursiveASTVisitor &>::type>(*this) > \ > .Traverse##NAME(static_cast<CLASS *>(VAR), QUEUE) > \ > : getDerived().Traverse##NAME(static_cast<CLASS *>(VAR))) > > > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
