ygribov added inline comments.
================
Comment at: test/Analysis/inline.cpp:308
@@ +307,3 @@
+ clang_analyzer_eval(0 != void_string); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
+ clang_analyzer_eval(0 != ((char *)void_string)[1]); //
expected-warning{{TRUE}}
+ }
----------------
zaks.anna wrote:
> ygribov wrote:
> > zaks.anna wrote:
> > > Why are we checking that the first element is not '0'?
> > We could check s[0] as well, there is no difference actually.
> Why we are checking for non-equality to '0' instead of checking for equality
> to 'b'?
Ah yeah, that would be more precise.
Repository:
rL LLVM
http://reviews.llvm.org/D14652
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
