rengolin added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D14570#288132, @compnerd wrote:
> Wow, this is tricky: the code change is in LLVM, and test change in clang :(. > However, this does seem to preserve the features. The problem is that Clang is the most important user of this library, which also has other users in LLVM. We just need to make sure that Clang is doing the right thing, and that the intentions are recorded on the right places. In this case, it's Clang. :) http://reviews.llvm.org/D14570 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
