r253161 2015-11-14 22:45 GMT+02:00 Martell Malone <martellmal...@gmail.com>:
> The reason why I didn't use -fuse-ld=lld2 was because on Windows we don't > have symlinks. > I figured passing flavor gets over this hurdle and the installation takes > up less space. > If you want to change it I have no objections we will just have to look at > having lld's cmake to ensure it is created on Windows like we do for clang++ > > The idea of forcing either lld or ld LGTM yaron. > I don't think using MSVC link.exe makes any sense to mingw users. > > On Saturday, November 14, 2015, Yaron Keren <yaron.ke...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Filipe: with mingw targetting Windows/COFF files I think only ld and lld >> makes sense as gold creates ELF files. I included Microsoft link.exe in the >> mingw-useld test but rethinking, no one really uses that configuration, see >> attached patch. Is that what you mean? >> >> Rafael: running under Windows which has symbolic links but they aren't >> really used as much (or at all) as under Linux. For example clang-cl.exe >> and clang++.exe are copies (not links) of clang.exe. >> >> Martell, what do you think? >> >> >> >> 2015-11-14 19:52 GMT+02:00 Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espind...@gmail.com>: >> >>> On 15 November 2015 at 02:39, Filipe Cabecinhas <fil...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > Handling of values other than lld looked weird. >>> > Can you make it a hard error to use something other than, I guess, ld, >>> gold, >>> > lld? >>> > Or are there other linkers available? >>> >>> What I find strange is that we use -flavor at all. We should ideally >>> just be using different links to lld, like we do with "-fuse-ld=lld2". >>> >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Rafael >>> >> >>
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
