alexfh added a comment.
Much better now. A few more comments.
================
Comment at: clang-tidy/cert/ThrownExceptionTypeCheck.cpp:18
@@ +17,3 @@
+namespace {
+AST_MATCHER(CXXConstructorDecl, isNoThrowCopyConstructible) {
+ if (!Node.isCopyConstructor())
----------------
nit: I suggest changing `isNoThrowCopyConstructible` to
`isNoThrowCopyConstructor`, because "constructible" is a trait of a class, not
its constructor.
================
Comment at: clang-tidy/cert/ThrownExceptionTypeCheck.cpp:22
@@ +21,3 @@
+
+ if (Node.isTrivial())
+ return true;
----------------
Out of curiosity: are we short-circuiting here for performance reasons or would
the code below return `false` in this case?
================
Comment at: clang-tidy/cert/ThrownExceptionTypeCheck.cpp:34
@@ +33,3 @@
+ }
+ return true;
+}
----------------
Is this `return` reachable? If yes, when exactly does this happen and is there
a test for this case?
http://reviews.llvm.org/D14619
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
