Please read http://clang.llvm.org/docs/ClangFormatStyleOptions.html#adding-additional-style-options
Does your style option qualify? On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 8:04 AM, JVApen <jva...@gmail.com> wrote: > JVApen created this revision. > JVApen added a reviewer: djasper. > JVApen added a subscriber: cfe-commits. > JVApen set the repository for this revision to rL LLVM. > Herald added a subscriber: klimek. > > Hi all, > > I've been playing around with the clang for a while now and really enjoy > it. Unfortunately clang-format does not yet do what I like it to do, so I > started hacking it. So here is my first successful attempt to get something > working. > > The issue: ConstructorInitializerAllOnOneLineOrOnePerLine only works if > 'If the constructor initializers don’t fit on a line', while I prefer it to > always work. In other words, I use the following formatting: > > ``` > Constructor() > : a(a) > , b(b) > ``` > > Since everyone can benefit from upstreaming, I like to share my changes > and get some feedback. > Here is already some of the stuff which I was uncertain about: > > - Should I keep ConstructorInitializerAllOnOneLineOrOnePerLine or rename > it (currently the second one) > - How to name the values, currently: Compact (old: false), BestFit (old: > true), OnePerLine (new) > - Is the back-ward compatibility in ScalarEnumerationTraits a good idea? > (On rename most likely not) > > JVApen > > > > Repository: > rL LLVM > > http://reviews.llvm.org/D14484 > > Files: > docs/ClangFormatStyleOptions.rst > include/clang/Format/Format.h > lib/Format/ContinuationIndenter.cpp > lib/Format/Format.cpp > lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp > unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp > >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
