On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Richard Smith <rich...@metafoo.co.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Richard Smith <rich...@metafoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>> It'd be simpler and would more directly match the C specification (and
>> would handle a few other cases better, such as placeholder types and atomic
>> types) if you instead passed the operand through DefaultLvalueConversion
>
>
> or rather, DefaultFunctionArrayLvalueConversion =)

That was the magic incantation I didn't find before; thank you for
pointing it out! Updated patch attached.

~Aaron

Attachment: generic.patch
Description: Binary data

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to