On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 7:19 AM, Alexander Kornienko <ale...@google.com> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Aaron Ballman <aaron.ball...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Daniel Berlin <dber...@dberlin.org> wrote: >> > dberlin added a subscriber: dberlin. >> > >> > ================ >> > Comment at: docs/clang-tidy/checks/cert-variadic-function-def.rst:13 >> > @@ +12,2 @@ >> > +`DCL50-CPP. Do not define a C-style variadic function >> > >> > +<https://www.securecoding.cert.org/confluence/display/cplusplus/DCL50-CPP.+Do+not+define+a+C-style+variadic+function>`_. >> > ---------------- >> > I'm sure this is oversight on CERT's part, but their website actually >> > has terms of use (click the terms of use at the bottom of the page) that >> > says this can't be copied/reused, and here you are, copying it. >> > It explicit says: " >> > Use of the Service. You may only display the content of the Service for >> > your own personal use (i.e., non-commercial use) and may not otherwise >> > copy, >> > reproduce, alter, modify, create derivative works, or publicly display any >> > content. " >> > >> > Before this is accepted, someone should email cert and say "hey, uh, >> > yeah, this seems bad", and get them to okay you doing this. >> > I'm sure they'll go and fix this. >> >> That's an excellent point, I will bring it up internally (I work for >> CERT) and report back. > > > Any news here?
Yes; I have heard back from CERT's legal team, and they have a document that I have sent (off-list) to Daniel for review. If it seems like it would resolve his concerns, then I think the next step will be to bring it to the LLVM foundation more formally to see how they would like to handle it. ~Aaron > >> >> >> ~Aaron >> >> > >> > >> > >> > http://reviews.llvm.org/D13446 >> > >> > >> > > > _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
