sbenza added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D14096#275902, @xazax.hun wrote:
> There is already a similar check in the Google package. What are the > differences between those two checks? What is the reason we can not just > register that check into the core guidelines module? That other check discourages c-style cast in favor of C++ style casts, even if it is a reinterpret_cast. It simply replaces the cstyle cast with an equivalent C++ one. It is basically a stylistic check. This check will warn unsafe cstyle casts, while allowing safe ones like int->uint casts. This one is a safety related check. http://reviews.llvm.org/D14096 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
