> I'm pretty sure it only affects template evaluation order, and does not change the mangling of any name.
I agree it doesn't change the mangling of any name. I just want to make sure that moving the initializer won't result in incompatible code gen. I'm sure I'm insane for being concerned about this, but I just want somebody to tell me I'm actually insane. It would make me feel better :) Sorry /Eric On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Evgeniy Stepanov <euge...@google.com> wrote: > eugenis added a comment. > > In http://reviews.llvm.org/D10677#266595, @EricWF wrote: > > > For the most part this looks good. I'm a touch concerned though about > the changes to the static initialization. The initializer is moved from > within the function body to outside it. Could you have somebody confirm > this won't affect the existing ABI? > > > I'm pretty sure it only affects template evaluation order, and does not > change the mangling of any name. > > > Repository: > rL LLVM > > http://reviews.llvm.org/D10677 > > > >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
