On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Jonathan Roelofs <jonat...@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On 10/6/15 4:03 PM, Richard Smith via cfe-commits wrote: > >> Author: rsmith >> Date: Tue Oct 6 17:03:22 2015 >> New Revision: 249475 >> >> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=249475&view=rev >> Log: >> Remove unnecessary inline functions capturing the contents of C library >> macros. >> >> The C standard requires that these be provided as functions even if >> they're >> also provided as macros, and a strict reading of the C++ standard library >> rules >> suggests that (for instance) &::isdigit == &::std::isdigit, so these >> wrappers >> are technically non-conforming. >> > > Mind adding testcases to reinforce those identities, quoting the relevant > bit(s) of the standard? Sure, sounds like a good idea (but it's slightly tricky to test since [global.functions]/2's footnote allows an implementation to declare additional overloads of these functions).
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
