Author: ericwf
Date: Mon Oct 5 23:12:30 2015
New Revision: 249372
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=249372&view=rev
Log:
Add comments for LWG issues 2219 and 2367
Modified:
libcxx/trunk/www/kona.html
Modified: libcxx/trunk/www/kona.html
URL:
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/www/kona.html?rev=249372&r1=249371&r2=249372&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- libcxx/trunk/www/kona.html (original)
+++ libcxx/trunk/www/kona.html Mon Oct 5 23:12:30 2015
@@ -113,13 +113,13 @@
<li>2156 - check and make sure that we already do this. Write a test.</li>
<li>2181 - I suspect that this will not require any code changes, but will
need to be read carefully.</li>
<li>2218 - Shouldn't require any code changes.</li>
-<li>2219 - Punt to Eric</li>
+<li>2219 - Sizable changes required. INVOKE needs 2 additional overloads and
plenty of tests. I'm not going to back port this to C++03. (Eric)</li>
<li>2244 - We don't do this; easy fix; think about how to test it.</li>
<li>2250 - Looks like wording cleanup. Need to check more closely, but I think
there's no code changes here.</li>
<li><i>2259 - No code changes needed here.</i></li>
<li>2336 - <b>Check later</b></li>
<li>2353 - Simple change, needs a test. (test probably used to exist)</li>
-<li>2367 - Ask Eric to do it. Tests.</li>
+<li>2367 - Already done in tuple, pair needs to be done. Tests. (Eric)</li>
<li><i>2380 - No code changes here; we already do this.</i></li>
<li><i>2384 - Wording cleanup; no code change required</i></li>
<li>2385 - Removing broken signatures. Only question is "how far back"?</li>
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
