On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Adrian Prantl via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> aprantl added a comment. > > Some bikeshedding about -di-kind={full|limited|line-tables}: > > 1. Is there a good reason not to spell out -debug-info-kind? > 2. "full" is misleading as it will still only emit debug info for types > actually used by the program. I think "standalone" would be more > descriptive. > 3. Why not "line-tables-only" like in -gline-tables-only? > All of that sounds reasonable to me, but I'm not too fussed in any direction since it's just cc1. > > > http://reviews.llvm.org/D13221 > > > > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits