On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Adrian Prantl via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> aprantl added a comment.
>
> Some bikeshedding about -di-kind={full|limited|line-tables}:
>
> 1. Is there a good reason not to spell out -debug-info-kind?
> 2. "full" is misleading as it will still only emit debug info for types
> actually used by the program. I think "standalone" would be more
> descriptive.
> 3. Why not "line-tables-only" like in -gline-tables-only?
>

All of that sounds reasonable to me, but I'm not too fussed in any
direction since it's just cc1.


>
>
> http://reviews.llvm.org/D13221
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-commits mailing list
> cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to