Late to the party, but I wanted to ask: is there a way to indicate to the checker that we really *did* mean sizeof()?
I think I've stumbled over code in our code base that uses sizeof(container) to report memory usage statistics and it seems valid, so it'd be nice if this checker could be silenced on a case-by-case basis. Thanks, - Kim On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Alexander Kornienko via cfe-commits <cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Indeed. But this has been fixed before I could get to it. > > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 10:47 PM, Aaron Ballman via cfe-commits > <cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> aaron.ballman added a comment. >> >> This appears to have broken one of the bots: >> >> http://bb.pgr.jp/builders/ninja-x64-msvc-RA-centos6/builds/15065 >> >> >> http://reviews.llvm.org/D12759 >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cfe-commits mailing list >> cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org >> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits > > > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits > _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
