+cfe-commits On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 6:56 PM, Angel Garcia <angelgar...@google.com> wrote:
> Hi Ted, > > I was working on a clang-tidy check, and today I discovered that it was > unable to do several replacements in different arguments of the same macro > call. At first, I thought it was a bug, and trying to figure out why this > was happening, I found that the replacements were rejected in > *lib/Edit/EditedSource.cpp:46*, where there is a comment that says > "Trying to write in a macro argument input that has already been written > for another argument of the same macro". This comment means that this > changes are rejected on purpose. > > At the commit history, I saw that you had commited > <http://reviews.llvm.org/rL152141> this code (that's why I am asking > you). Do you think that there is a way around this? I don't really > understand why there is a particular case for the macros here, and > understanding it would help me to decide whether I should give up on trying > to make this work, or try to find a "better" solution. > > Thanks and sorry for the inconvenience, > Angel >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
