EricWF added a comment.

In http://reviews.llvm.org/D11963#227933, @jroelofs wrote:

> In http://reviews.llvm.org/D11963#227444, @EricWF wrote:
>
> > I also just realized that this change will currently likely play havoc with 
> > how libc++ and libc++abi build together. In order to build libc++ and 
> > libc++abi together we would need to
> >
> > 1. Configure libc++ pointing to the libc++abi headers in order to generate 
> > the __config_site file.
> > 2. Configure libc++abi pointing it to the libc++ build directory for the 
> > headers.
> > 3. build libc++abi
> > 4. build libc++
> >
> >   I'm not quite sure how this would work for an in-tree build.
>
>
> This patch, combined with http://reviews.llvm.org/D11964, works the way you 
> describe.


Wouldn't it still be a mess if you build both libc++ and libc++abi out-of-tree? 
The user would have to be aware of these weird requirements.


http://reviews.llvm.org/D11963



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to