No, it does not occur in the 3.7 branch, thanks for reverting those changes. :)
-Dimitry > On 18 Aug 2015, at 01:09, Hans Wennborg <h...@chromium.org> wrote: > > The 3.7 branch does have the include guards; they were re-added in > http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=243925&view=rev. That happened > after rc2, but it will be in rc3. > > Can you double check if you're still running into problems on the 3.7 branch? > > - Hans > > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Dimitry Andric <dimi...@andric.com> wrote: >> [Re-sending, used the old cfe-commits address by accident] >> >> Where is the other thread? This problem still exists, for both trunk and >> the upcoming 3.7.0 RC3. I'll try to submit a patch tomorrow to partially >> restore the include guards, so we won't have a broken release. >> >> -Dimitry >> >> On 03 Aug 2015, at 18:48, Eric Christopher <echri...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> Where are the negative test cases? Diagnosing uses of these functions >>> when they aren't valid is really important - it's a pretty serious >>> regression if we don't. >> >> >> Two threads, I'm going to take this in the other thread. :) >> >> -eric >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cfe-commits mailing list >> cfe-comm...@cs.uiuc.edu >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits >> >>
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
