theraven added inline comments.

================
Comment at: include/__mutex_base:246
@@ -266,3 +245,3 @@
 
-class _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS condition_variable
+class _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS condition_variable : private 
__libcxx_support::condition_variable
 {
----------------
Does this change the ABI for a mutex on *NIX platforms?  We can't change the 
class layout for existing platforms (though we can indirect things via 
typedefs).

================
Comment at: include/mutex:182
@@ -181,2 +181,3 @@
 #endif
-#include <sched.h>
+#ifndef _WIN32
+#include <support/pthread/mutex.hpp>
----------------
As above, there should probably be in a cross-platform support file that 
includes these.  In particular, not-win32 is not the correct condition for 
uses-pthreads.  We should probably have something in __config that determines 
the thread library to use.  It would be quite nice to have a C11 thread back 
end, for example (though most implementations currently wrap pthreads).

================
Comment at: include/mutex:269
@@ -285,3 +268,3 @@
 bool
 recursive_timed_mutex::try_lock_until(const chrono::time_point<_Clock, 
_Duration>& __t)
 {
----------------
I didn't realise this idiocy made it into C++11, I thought it was confined to 
C11.  Locking a mutex using anything other than time intervals on the monotonic 
time source is a great way of producing non-working programs.  We should 
probably warn if anyone actually calls this...


Repository:
  rL LLVM

http://reviews.llvm.org/D11781



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to