On Sun, 18 Aug 2024 at 23:37, David Edelsohn via cfarm-users
<cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net> wrote:
>
> The intent is to keep the AIX installation pure so that it behaves like a 
> normal AIX system -- for better or worse.  It's the only way to ensure that 
> anything tested on the system behaves consistently for any normal user of a 
> package tested on the system.
>
> The AIX OSS team have made an effort to segregate official AIX supported 
> packages and commands from FOSS packages and commands.  There are some 
> commands, like tar, sed, make, that conflict, and there are other commands 
> where AIX is trying to ensure that customers don't assume an incorrect level 
> of support because a command is in the normal AIX system namespace.

That makes perfect sense. Perhaps, instead of adding things from /opt
to the default path, or symlinks from /opt to /usr, it could be
entertained
to add more harmony for what /opt/ and especially /opt/freeware
contain, without adding those things to the PATH. That way users who
want
to treat the cfarm machines uniformly could just depend on things
being in /opt/freeware, and on linux systems, the things installed on
the system
can be just symlinked to /opt/freeware?
_______________________________________________
cfarm-users mailing list
cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net
https://lists.tetaneutral.net/listinfo/cfarm-users

Reply via email to