> On Mar 7, 2024, at 12:29 PM, Segher Boessenkool via cfarm-users > <cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net> wrote: > > The disk of gcc110 is too small for how it is used. That has been the > case since day 1, it isn't new. There are 100s of active users on this > system, and most do not clean up after themselves. A disk slightly > smaller than 2TB is only good for not so popular systems, for systems > that are more popular we really need 3TB (and more is always better of > course).
Agreed. Disks are relatively cheap too. Anyone have a spare 10TB IronWolf they could donate to the datacenter? Currently on sale for $160. > The "only" problem with a filled up fs is that it destroys other > people's ability to do work. It is antisocial. Clean up after > yourself! You should have been taught that in kindergarten already ;-) I get there are temp situations that call for it, but sentiment is kind of ironic when a single user is using 28% of the playground all to themselves, while asking others to be more respectful of their playground use. Machine has over 1000 accounts with more than 50 active. Equitable use would dictate no active user exceeding 30GB without calling that use into question and scrutiny. Even that doesn’t scale to all 1000, but all things equal, that’s the hardware constraint for current use. Cheers, Sean p.s. 6 versions of 71 architectures, 32GB of sources, 45GB -dap files, multiple 150GB build folders … and more. Got to be *some* fat that could be trimmed in all that. Log file alone begs for a -dapgz option to compress append on the fly (probably even speed it up to have less I/O writing to disk). _______________________________________________ cfarm-users mailing list cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net https://lists.tetaneutral.net/listinfo/cfarm-users
