Hello Graff, On 06/10/18 09:02 PM, CM Graff via cfarm-users wrote:
To follow up, I think that the problem is a bit more complex. I am guessing now that there is a Linux/ELF compat mechanism somewhere in the default compiler search path. I think for hlibc to work with NetBSD I'll have to research how this all works, or perhaps even specify a different binary format. Because I am redirecting the compiler search paths to only look for hlibc's libc.a, crt1.o, crtn.o and crti.o something is probably getting excluded. Open to suggestions, but I am starting to think this is not a system maintenance issue but something of a different nature having to do with various less used compiler invocations.
I know very little about the above, but note that: 1. gcc300 is NetBSD 7.1 - not yet upgraded to NetBSD 8.0. Not sure if there is a big difference. I do plan to upgrade in the near future. 2. I've just installed clang-5.0.2 on gcc300, perhaps using it instead of the (very old) gcc would make things easier to troubleshoot. regards, - assaf _______________________________________________ cfarm-users mailing list cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net https://lists.tetaneutral.net/listinfo/cfarm-users
