What's the bufferbloat verdict on https://speed.cloudflare.com/ ?

Mat

> On 1 May 2020, at 20:48, Sebastian Moeller <moell...@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
> Hi Dave,
> 
> well, it was a free service and it lasted a long time. I want to raise a 
> toast to Justin and convey my sincere thanks for years of investing into the 
> "good" of the internet. 
> 
> Now, the question is which test is going to be the rightful successor? 
> 
> Short of running netperf/irtt/iper2/iperf3 on a hosted server, I see lots of 
> potential but none of the tests are really there yet (grievances in now 
> particular order):
> 
> OOKLA: speedtest.net.
>       Pros: ubiquitious, allows selection of single flow versus multi-flow 
> test, allows server selection
>       Cons: only IPv4, only static unloaded RTT measurement, no control over 
> measurement duration
>       BUFFERBLOAT verdict: incomplete, maybe usable as load generator
> 
> 
> NETFLIX: fast.com.
>       Pros: allows selection of upload testing, supposedly decent back-end, 
> duration configurable
>               allows unloaded, loaded download and loaded upload RTT 
> measurements (but reports sinlge numbers for loaded and unloaded RTT, that 
> are not the max)
>       Cons: RTT report as two numbers one for the loaded and one for unloaded 
> RTT, time-course of RTTs missing
>       BUFFERBLOAT verdict: incomplete, but oh, so close...
> 
> 
> NPERF: nperf.com
>       Pros: allows server selection, RTT measurement and report as time 
> course, also reports average rates and static RTT/jitter for Up- and Download
>       Cons: RTT measurement for unloaded only, reported RTT static only , no 
> control over measurement duration
>       BUFFERBLOAT verdict: incomplete,
> 
> 
> THINKBROADBAND: www.thinkbroadband.com/speedtest
>       Pros: IPv6, reports coarse RTT time courses for all three measurement 
> phases
>       Cons: only static unloaded RTT report in final results, time courses 
> only visible immediately after testing, no control over measurement duration
>       BUFFERBLOAT verdict: a bit coarse, might work for users within a 
> reasonable distance to the UK for acute de-bloating sessions (history 
> reporting is bad though)
> 
> 
> honorable mentioning:
>       BREITBANDMESSUNG: breitbandmessung.de
>       Pros: query of contracted internet access speed before measurement, 
> with a scheduler that will only start a test when the backend has sufficient 
> capacity to saturate the user-supplied contracted rates, IPv6 (happy-eyeballs)
>       Cons: only static unloaded RTT measurement, no control over measurement 
> duration
>       BUFFERBLOAT verdict: unsuitable, exceot as load generator, but the 
> bandwidth reservation feature is quite nice.
> 
> Best Regards
>       Sebastian
> 
> 
>> On May 1, 2020, at 18:44, Dave Taht <dave.t...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> https://www.reddit.com/r/HomeNetworking/comments/gbd6g0/dsl_reports_speed_test_no_longer_free/
>> 
>> They ran out of bandwidth.
>> 
>> Message to users here:
>> 
>> http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Make Music, Not War
>> 
>> Dave Täht
>> CTO, TekLibre, LLC
>> http://www.teklibre.com
>> Tel: 1-831-435-0729
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cake mailing list
>> c...@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> bl...@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat

_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel

Reply via email to