I share the reproducable builds thing - but for all vendors, including
cisco and openwrt.

Trust but verify.

On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 11:44 AM Jim Gettys <j...@freedesktop.org> wrote:
>
> It's worth looking at the UK government oversight report:
>
> https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/790270/HCSEC_OversightBoardReport-2019.pdf
>
> Not clear that Huawei is worse than other 5g vendors, if our experience with 
> other embedded system vendors is any clue.  Certainly I was unimpressed by 
> ALU's software engineering practices when I was at Bell Labs.  The ownership 
> structure of Huawei is "interesting", to say the least.
>
> My solution is more radical: all the vendors should be held to much higher 
> standards, including reproducible builds (something that the UK government 
> has been trying to get them to do for years, and failed).
>
> - Jim
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 2:32 PM David P. Reed <dpr...@deepplum.com> wrote:
>>
>> Look, the existence of security flaws in software isn't news. Real news 
>> would be if there were systems discovered to have no flaws at all...
>>
>>
>>
>> So what does this article really say?
>>
>>
>>
>> It says that Britain and the US intelligence officials are now going after 
>> Huawei in a new way, because the idea that Huawei just steals intellectual 
>> property no longer flies - they actually have great technology that the 
>> non-Chinese never had.
>>
>>
>>
>> And there is a massive Trade War currently aimed between Trump and China.
>>
>>
>>
>> And recently, the UK, including GCHQ, said it was NOT going to stop plans to 
>> deploy Huawei telecom gear, because it saw no particular flaws worth 
>> worrying about if UK operators wanted to use Huawei "5G" gear because it was 
>> better and cheaper.
>>
>>
>>
>> You can see, of course, that the US diplomatic efforts under Pompeo might go 
>> into high gear to get some kind of supportive public response from somewhere 
>> in the UK, even if the UK government itself wasn't going to support the US.
>>
>>
>>
>> Hence, the PR guys figured out how to get a story into the NYTimes and other 
>> papers that appears to contradict the UK decision.
>>
>>
>>
>> This is how the game is played.
>>
>>
>>
>> This is how Trade Wars are conducted (we haven't seen them for decades, so 
>> we aren't used to them, but we had the big fearmongering about Japan back in 
>> the '80's that was similar, and the Japanese "lead" with its "Fifth 
>> Generation Computing" effort required major tax dollars to protect the US 
>> from becoming a third world country)
>>
>>
>>
>> Humans don't think. They react emotionally, and tribally.
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: "Dave Taht" <dave.t...@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 2:16pm
>> To: "David P. Reed" <dpr...@deepplum.com>
>> Cc: "cerowrt-devel" <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>, "bloat" 
>> <bl...@lists.bufferbloat.net>
>> Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] plenty of huawei in the news today
>>
>> Well, it's a widely placed story in every newspaper.
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 11:16 AM David P. Reed <dpr...@deepplum.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > The NYTimes has become a mouthpiece for those who want to see China as the 
>> > new evil empire. Recent pieces by David Sanger have hyped the idea that 
>> > the US has a "5G Gap" and that China (Huawei) will threaten to conquer the 
>> > world with 5G superiority, so we should be vigilantly opposing Huawei.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Worth noting that Cisco, ALU, ... are not any better than Huawei appears 
>> > to be in these matters. But they aren't getting headlines in the NYTimes.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Remember, Judith Miller wrote NYTimes headlines based on "leaks from 
>> > senior intelligence officials" that Saddam Hussein was on the verge of 
>> > deploying dirty bombs, nuclear missiles and biowarfare agents.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Recently, Bloomberg got scammed by "leaks from senior intelligence 
>> > officials" that Supermicro (Chinese) had built and sold server 
>> > motherboards that had special chips soldered into them that didn't belong 
>> > there [the stories were completely debunked by the companies supposedly 
>> > targeted].
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Personally, I think the cynical fearmongering here does the legitimate 
>> > security engineering community no good at all. It's just more "wag the 
>> > dog" psyops, designed to let all the pseudo-security-experts take over the 
>> > story and get their 15 minutes in the headlines.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > The Qualcomms and Ciscos of the US are happy to get the USG to help scare 
>> > countries off of Chinese brandnames. But the open secret is that Qualcomm 
>> > and Cisco's systems are designed and made in China, too. There's no US 
>> > manufacturing of switches, and precious few entirely American hardware 
>> > design centers, either.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > So be a little skeptical. Check the story behind the story. Don't believe 
>> > stories based on "intelligence agency" leaks.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: "Dave Taht" <dave.t...@gmail.com>
>> > Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 1:55pm
>> > To: "cerowrt-devel" <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>, "bloat" 
>> > <bl...@lists.bufferbloat.net>
>> > Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] plenty of huawei in the news today
>> >
>> > https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/28/technology/huawei-security-british-report.html
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > Dave Täht
>> > CTO, TekLibre, LLC
>> > http://www.teklibre.com
>> > Tel: 1-831-205-9740
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Cerowrt-devel mailing list
>> > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Dave Täht
>> CTO, TekLibre, LLC
>> http://www.teklibre.com
>> Tel: 1-831-205-9740
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bloat mailing list
>> bl...@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat



-- 

Dave Täht
CTO, TekLibre, LLC
http://www.teklibre.com
Tel: 1-831-205-9740
_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel

Reply via email to