huh? I pulled from the repo you were committing to, I thought.... is that not correct?
I can do a build of a newer cake... before I get on the plane... On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 5:46 AM, Jonathan Morton <chromati...@gmail.com> wrote: > It looks like your cake is new enough to support set associative hashing, > but not the new overhead handling. The ATM flag was put in a long time ago. > > Looking at the code which grabs those options (cake_change), there doesn't > seem to be a way to detect whether an unsupported option was provided by > userspace, unless nla_parse_nested returns an error if the provided option > struct would be overflowed. Clearly it doesn't, but just truncates it to > fit. > > - Jonathan Morton -- Dave Täht worldwide bufferbloat report: http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/results/bufferbloat And: What will it take to vastly improve wifi for everyone? https://plus.google.com/u/0/explore/makewififast _______________________________________________ Cerowrt-devel mailing list Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
