On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Jonathan Morton <chromati...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 23 Mar, 2015, at 03:45, David Lang <da...@lang.hm> wrote: >> >> are we running into performance issues with fq_codel? I thought all the >> problems were with HTB or ingress shaping. > > Cake is, in part, a response to the HTB problem; it is a few percent more > efficient so far than an equivalent HTB+fq_codel combination. It will have a > few other novel features, too. > > Bobbie is a response to the ingress-shaping problem. A policer (with no > queue) can be run without involving an IFB device, which we believe has a > large overhead.
yep. 3rd option is to go make better hardware. Not getting very far on this https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/onetswitch/onetswitch-open-source-hardware-for-networking going to have to try harder. Honestly had hoped that broadcom, qca, cisco, or somebody making chips would have got it right by now. > - Jonathan Morton > -- Dave Täht Let's make wifi fast, less jittery and reliable again! https://plus.google.com/u/0/107942175615993706558/posts/TVX3o84jjmb _______________________________________________ Cerowrt-devel mailing list Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
