HI Dave,

On Oct 19, 2014, at 20:24 , Dave Taht <[email protected]> wrote:

> On at least one verizon device I've tried it appeared that they had
> SFQ or something similar on egress from the modem.
> 
> http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/codel/wiki/RRUL_Rogues_Gallery#Verizon-FIOS-Testing-at-25Mbit-up-and-25Mbit-down
> 
> So you only needed to shape the download. which is good as we start
> peaking out at 50Mbit download total. But only measurements can tell.

        So on Hnymans community openwrt build a few fortunate ones on excellent 
lines seem to get decent results even at 110-120 Mbps combined:
https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?pid=250989#p250989
and:
https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?pid=251013#p251013
I have no idea why and both lines were reasonably well-behaved even without any 
AQM/QOS...

Also I wonder whether when we increase the quantum for higher rates to give HTB 
some breathing room, whether we also should increase burst and cburst? My hunch 
is that quantum affects the switching between the leaves, while busts and 
cburst should allow to dump more data to lower layers inside each leaf qdisc. 
And since we are running behind, maybe taking a bigger shovel can help some. (I 
assume this needs to be titrated not to kill latency under load, but if we can 
only effective have HTB execute x times per second we can easily afford to dump 
line-rate/maxHTB_iteratin_rate bytes per opportunity, no?) My own internet link 
is way to slow to test this...

Best Regards
        Sebastian

> 
> 
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Ernesto Elias <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>> Hello everyone!
>> I have a question about the wndr3800 routing limit. I went back to the older
>> submissions to see if I can find what would be the answer for it. But in my
>> search I haven't managed to find a definite answer. From what I seen about
>> setting the limit it can do with SQM is 50, 60, or 80 mbit. I'm just
>> wondering if anyone can shed some light for me here as I have verizon fios
>> and my speeds are 50 dl/50 ul. Thank you guys very much!
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Dave Täht
> 
> thttp://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/bloat/wiki/Upcoming_Talks
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel

_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel

Reply via email to