Hi Aaron,
On Sep 3, 2014, at 17:12 , Aaron Wood <wood...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 4:08 AM, Jonathan Morton <chromati...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Given that the CPU load is confirmed as high, the pcap probably isn't as
> useful. The rest would be interesting to look at.
>
> Are you able to test with smaller packet sizes? That might help to isolate
> packet-throughput (ie. connection tracking) versus byte-throughput problems.
>
> - Jonathan Morton
>
> Doing another test setup will take a few days (maybe not until the weekend).
> But I can get the data uploaded, and do some preliminary crunching on it.
So the current SQM system allows to shape on multiple interfaces, so
you could set up the shaper on se00 and test between sw10 and se00 (should work
if you reliably get fast enough wifi connection, something like combined shaped
bandwidth <= 70% of wifi rate should work). That would avoid the whole firewall
and connection tracking logic.
My home wifi environment is quite variable/noisy and not well-suited
for this test: with rrul_be I got stuck at around 70Mbps combined bandwidth,
with different distributions of the up and down-leg for no-shaping, shaping to
50Mbps10Mbps, and shaping to 100Mbps50Mbps. SIRQ got pretty much pegged at
96-99% during all netperf-wrapper runs, so I assume this to be the bottleneck
(the radio was in the > 200mbps range during the test with occasional drops to
150mbps). So my conclusion would: be it really is the shaping that is limited
on my wndr3700v2 with cerowrt 3.10.50-1, again if I would be confident about
the measurement which I am not (but EOUTOFTIME). That or my rf environment
might only allow for roughly 70-80Mbps combined throughput. For what it is
worth: test where performed between macbook running macosx 10.9.4 and hp
proliant n54l running 64bit openSuse 13.1, kernel 3.11.10-17 (AMD turion with
tg3 gbit ethernet adapter (BQL enabled), running fq_codel on eth0), with sha
ping on the se00 interface.
Best Regards
Sebastian
>
> -Aaron
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
