Hi Rich,
On Mar 24, 2014, at 17:32 , Rich Brown <richb.hano...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I updated the wiki to incorporate features of 3.10.32-12.
>
> - The SQM page has been updated to include current screen shots and describe
> the options. A question: what are the units for the Hard Limit on
> ingress/egress?
In most cases its packets, but with bfifo (which currently can not be
selected? its bytes (the b in bfifo stands for bytes, if no value given this
defaults to txquelength * MTU). I think it should be okay to ignore bfifo for
now and just explain this as packets. If we expose bfifo as a selection we can
always revisit that…
Best Regards
Sebastian
>
> http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/cerowrt/wiki/Setting_up_SQM_for_CeroWrt_310
>
> - The Release Notes page has been updated to mention DNSSEC and BCP38. I'm
> still not clear whether DNSSEC is turned on/operational by default. What
> should that page say?
>
> http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/cerowrt/wiki/CeroWrt_310_Release_Notes
>
> - I have added a BCP38 page to give an overview of that page. A question that
> I haven't seen addressed in the commentary on the list: Does this BCP38
> implement also filter out spoofed source addresses? (I imagine it would, but
> the pages don't specifically say so.)
>
> http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/cerowrt/wiki/CeroWrt_and_BCP38
>
> Although I try to write carefully, sometimes I'm just makin' stuff up.
> Comments requested. Thanks.
>
> Rich
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
