Hi Rich,
On Jan 11, 2014, at 17:29 , Rich Brown <richb.hano...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The VDSL option is burning up way too many of my brain cells. Given that VDSL
> may well use ATM, while VDSL2 is unlikely to use ATM, I think that it isn’t
> useful to include it as a top-level choice .
>
> In the new pages, I propose removing the VDSL choice, leaving:
>
> - “ATM (any kind of DSL link)” and
> - “None”
Well, that looks like a decent recommendation for the wiki. The SQM
configuration page still needs to expose all three values, atm, ethernet, and
none so that people can actually change things...
>
> and letting people tune the settings after reading the “Everything you wanted
> to know…” page if they want to optimize.
Exactly, we still need options exposed for making this possible.
>
> http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/cerowrt/wiki/Setting_up_AQM_for_CeroWrt_310
>
> -and-
>
> http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/cerowrt/wiki/Everything_you_wanted_to_know_about_Link_Layer_Adaptation
>
> Rich
Best Regards
Sebastian
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
