We are using Micron 5200 PRO, 1.92TB for RBD images on KVM and are very happy
with the performance. We are using EC 6+2 pools, which really eat up IOPs.
Still, we get enough performance out to run 20-50 VMs per disk, which results
in good space utilisation as well since our default image size is 50GB and we
take rolling snapshots. I was thinking about 4TB disks also, but am concerned
that their IOPs/TB performance is too low for images on EC pools.
We found the raw throughput in fio benchmarks to be very different for
write-cache enabled and disabled, exactly as explained in the performance
article. Changing write cache settings is a boot-time operation. Unfortunately,
I couldn't find a reliable way to disable write cache at boot time (I was
looking for tuned configs) and ended up adding this to a container startup
script:
if [[ "$1" == "osd_ceph_disk_activate" && -n "${OSD_DEVICE}" ]] ; then
echo "Disabling write cache on ${OSD_DEVICE}"
/usr/sbin/smartctl -s wcache=off "${OSD_DEVICE}"
fi
This works for both, SAS and SATA drives and ensures that write cache is
disabled before an OSD daemon starts.
Best regards,
=================
Frank Schilder
AIT Risø Campus
Bygning 109, rum S14
________________________________________
From: ceph-users <ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com> on behalf of Eric K.
Miller <emil...@genesishosting.com>
Sent: 19 January 2020 04:24:33
To: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] low io with enterprise SSDs ceph luminous - can we
expect more? [klartext]
Hi Vitaliy,
Similar to Stefan, we have a bunch of Micron 5200's (3.84TB ECO SATA version)
in a Ceph cluster (Nautilus) and performance seems less than optimal. I have
followed all instructions on your site (thank you for your wonderful article
btw!!), but I haven't seen much change.
The only thing I could think of is that "maybe" disabling the write cache only
takes place upon a reboot or power cycle? Is that necessary? Or is it a
"live" change?
I have tested with the cache disabled as well as enabled on all drives. We're
using fio running in a QEMU/KVM VM in an OpenStack cluster, so not "raw" access
to the Micron 5200's. OSD (Bluestore) nodes run CentOS 7 using a 4.18.x
kernel. Testing doesn't show any, or much, difference, enough that the
variations could be considered "noise" in the results. Certainly no change
that anyone could tell.
Thought I'd check to see if you, or anyone else, might have any suggestions
specific to the Micron 5200.
We have some Micron 5300's inbound, but probably won't have them here for
another few weeks due to Micron's manufacturing delays, so will be able to test
these raw drives soon. I will report back after, but if you know anything
about these, I'm all ears. :)
Thank you!
Eric
From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf Of Stefan
Bauer
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 10:28 AM
To: undisclosed-recipients
Cc: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] low io with enterprise SSDs ceph luminous - can we
expect more? [klartext]
Thank you all,
performance is indeed better now. Can now go back to sleep ;)
KR
Stefan
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Виталий Филиппов <vita...@yourcmc.ru>
Gesendet: Dienstag 14 Januar 2020 10:28
An: Wido den Hollander <w...@42on.com>; Stefan Bauer <stefan.ba...@cubewerk.de>
CC: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
Betreff: Re: [ceph-users] low io with enterprise SSDs ceph luminous - can we
expect more? [klartext]
...disable signatures and rbd cache. I didn't mention it in the email to not
repeat myself. But I have it in the article :-)
--
With best regards,
Vitaliy Filippov
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
