Done : https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/41756
---- On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 14:48:42 +0800 Lars Marowsky-Bree <l...@suse.com>
wrote ----
On 2019-09-10T13:36:53, Konstantin Shalygin <mailto:k0...@k0ste.ru> wrote:
> > So I am correct in 2048 being a very high number and should go for
> > either 256 or 512 like you said for a cluster of my size with the EC
> > Pool of 8+2?
> Indeed. I suggest stay at 256.
Might as well go to 512, but the 2^n is really important.
Also, please open a tracker issue with your cluster details so the
autoscaler can be fixed to make a more sensible recommendation.
Thanks!,
Lars
--
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Mary Higgins, Sri Rasiah, HRB 21284 (AG
Nürnberg)
"Architects should open possibilities and not determine everything." (Ueli
Zbinden)
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
mailto:ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
