Hi Greg, Can you please share the api details for COPY_FROM or any reference document?
Thanks , Muthu On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 4:12 AM Brad Hubbard <bhubb...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 4:25 AM Gregory Farnum <gfar...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > I'm not sure how or why you'd get an object class involved in doing > > this in the normal course of affairs. > > > > There's a copy_from op that a client can send and which copies an > > object from another OSD into the target object. That's probably the > > primitive you want to build on. Note that the OSD doesn't do much > > Argh! yes, good idea. We really should document that! > > > consistency checking (it validates that the object version matches an > > input, but if they don't it just returns an error) so the client > > application is responsible for any locking needed. > > -Greg > > > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 3:49 AM Brad Hubbard <bhubb...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > Yes, this should be possible using an object class which is also a > > > RADOS client (via the RADOS API). You'll still have some client > > > traffic as the machine running the object class will still need to > > > connect to the relevant primary osd and send the write (presumably in > > > some situations though this will be the same machine). > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 4:08 PM nokia ceph <nokiacephus...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Brett, > > > > > > > > I think I was wrong here in the requirement description. It is not > about data replication , we need same content stored in different > object/name. > > > > We store video contents inside the ceph cluster. And our new > requirement is we need to store same content for different users , hence > need same content in different object name . if client sends write request > for object x and sets number of copies as 100, then cluster has to clone > 100 copies of object x and store it as object x1, objectx2,etc. Currently > this is done in the client side where objectx1, object x2...objectx100 are > cloned inside the client and write request sent for all 100 objects which > we want to avoid to reduce network consumption. > > > > > > > > Similar usecases are rbd snapshot , radosgw copy . > > > > > > > > Is this possible in object class ? > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > Muthu > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 7:58 PM Brett Chancellor < > bchancel...@salesforce.com> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> Ceph already does this by default. For each replicated pool, you > can set the 'size' which is the number of copies you want Ceph to maintain. > The accepted norm for replicas is 3, but you can set it higher if you want > to incur the performance penalty. > > > >> > > > >> On Mon, Jul 1, 2019, 6:01 AM nokia ceph <nokiacephus...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> Hi Brad, > > > >>> > > > >>> Thank you for your response , and we will check this video as well. > > > >>> Our requirement is while writing an object into the cluster , if > we can provide number of copies to be made , the network consumption > between client and cluster will be only for one object write. However , the > cluster will clone/copy multiple objects and stores inside the cluster. > > > >>> > > > >>> Thanks, > > > >>> Muthu > > > >>> > > > >>> On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 9:23 AM Brad Hubbard <bhubb...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 8:58 PM nokia ceph < > nokiacephus...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > Hi Team, > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > We have a requirement to create multiple copies of an object > and currently we are handling it in client side to write as separate > objects and this causes huge network traffic between client and cluster. > > > >>>> > Is there possibility of cloning an object to multiple copies > using librados api? > > > >>>> > Please share the document details if it is feasible. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> It may be possible to use an object class to accomplish what you > want > > > >>>> to achieve but the more we understand what you are trying to do, > the > > > >>>> better the advice we can offer (at the moment your description > sounds > > > >>>> like replication which is already part of RADOS as you know). > > > >>>> > > > >>>> More on object classes from Cephalocon Barcelona in May this year: > > > >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EVrP9MXiiuU > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > Thanks, > > > >>>> > Muthu > > > >>>> > _______________________________________________ > > > >>>> > ceph-users mailing list > > > >>>> > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > > > >>>> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> -- > > > >>>> Cheers, > > > >>>> Brad > > > >>> > > > >>> _______________________________________________ > > > >>> ceph-users mailing list > > > >>> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > > > >>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Cheers, > > > Brad > > > _______________________________________________ > > > ceph-users mailing list > > > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > > > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > > > -- > Cheers, > Brad >
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
