Hi, Konstantin.
Thanks for the reply.
I know about stale instances and that they remained from prior version.
I ask about “marker” of bucket. I have bucket “clx” and I can see his current
marker in stale-instances list.
As I know, stale-instances list must contain only previous marker ids.
From: Konstantin Shalygin <k0...@k0ste.ru>
Date: Friday, 21 June 2019 at 15:30
To: Rudenko Aleksandr <arude...@croc.ru>
Cc: "ceph-users@lists.ceph.com" <ceph-users@lists.ceph.com>
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] RGW: Is 'radosgw-admin reshard stale-instances rm'
safe?
Hi, folks.
I have Luminous 12.2.12. Auto-resharding is enabled.
In stale instances list I have:
# radosgw-admin reshard stale-instances list | grep clx
"clx:default.422998.196",
I have the same marker-id in bucket stats of this bucket:
# radosgw-admin bucket stats --bucket clx | grep marker
"marker": "default.422998.196",
"max_marker":
"0#,1#,2#,3#,4#,5#,6#,7#,8#,9#,10#,11#,12#,13#,14#,15#,16#,17#,18#,19#,20#,21#,22#,23#,24#,25#,26#,27#,28#,29#,30#,31#,32#,33#,34#,35#,36#,37#,38#,39#,40#,41#,42#,43#,44#,45#,46#,47#,48#,49#,50#,51#,52#",
I think it is not correct. I think active marker (in bucket stats) must not
match marker in stale instances list.
I have to run ‘radosgw-admin reshard stale-instances rm’ because I have large
OMAP warning, but I am not sure.
Is it safe to run: radosgw-admin reshard stale-instances rm ?
Yes, this staled by dynamic resharding, mostly prior 12.2.11. At least I have
not seen new one stales in my cluster.
k
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
