On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 5:02 PM Harald Staub <harald.st...@switch.ch> wrote:

> There are customers asking for 500 million objects in a single object
> storage bucket (i.e. 5000 shards), but also more. But we found some
> places that say that there is a limit in the number of shards per
> bucket, e.g.
>

We've got a cluster with a ~450M objects in a bucket with 4096 shards
that's working mostly fine.
Resharding caused a few timeout issues but that's mostly due to poor SSDs
in the index pool.

Not sure about listing performance, but it's probably horrible.

Paul


>
>
> https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_ceph_storage/2/html/object_gateway_guide_for_ubuntu/administration_cli
>
> It says that the maximum number of shards is 7877. But I could not find
> this magic number (or any other limit) on http://docs.ceph.com.
>
> Maybe this hard limit no longer applies to Nautilus? Maybe there is a
> recommended soft limit?
>
> Background about the application: Veeam (veeam.com) is a backup solution
> for VMWare that can embed a cloud storage tier with object storage (only
> with a single bucket). Just thinking loud:  Maybe this could work with
> an indexless bucket. Not sure how manageable this would be, e.g. to
> monitor how much space is used. Maybe separate pools would be needed.
>
>   Harry
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to