On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 6:48 AM Glen Baars <g...@onsitecomputers.com.au>
wrote:

> Interesting performance increase! I'm Iscsi it at a few installations and
> now a wonder what version of Centos is required to improve performance! Did
> the cluster go from Luminous to Mimic?
>

wild guess: probably related to updating tcmu-runner from 1.3 to 1.4; the
old versions had a bug that caused a long timeout on some operations in
some workloads


Paul


>
> Glen
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ceph-users <ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com> On Behalf Of Heðin
> Ejdesgaard Møller
> Sent: Saturday, 8 June 2019 8:00 AM
> To: Paul Emmerich <paul.emmer...@croit.io>; Igor Podlesny <
> ceph-u...@poige.ru>
> Cc: Ceph Users <ceph-users@lists.ceph.com>
> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Any CEPH's iSCSI gateway users?
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> I recently upgraded a RHCS-3.0 cluster with 4 iGW's to RHCS-3.2 on top of
> RHEL-
> 7.6
> Big block size performance went from ~350MB/s to about 1100MB/s on each
> lun, seen from a VM in vSphere-6.5 with data read from an ssd pool and
> written to a hdd pool, both being 3/2 replica.
> I have not experienced any hick-up since the upgrade.
> You will always have a degree of performance hit when using the iGW,
> because it's both an extra layer between consumer and hardware, and a
> potential choke- point, just like any "traditional" iSCSI based SAN
> solution.
>
> If you are considering to deploy the iGW on the upstream bits then I would
> recommend you to stick to CentOS, since a lot of it's development have
> happened on the RHEL platform.
>
> Regards
> Heðin Ejdesgaard
> Synack sp/f
>
> On frí, 2019-06-07 at 12:44 +0200, Paul Emmerich wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > ceph-iscsi 3.0 fixes a lot of problems and limitations of the older
> gateway.
> >
> > Best way to run it on Debian/Ubuntu is to build it yourself
> >
> >
> > Paul
> >
> > --
> > Paul Emmerich
> >
> > Looking for help with your Ceph cluster? Contact us at
> > https://croit.io
> >
> > croit GmbH
> > Freseniusstr. 31h
> > 81247 München
> > www.croit.io
> > Tel: +49 89 1896585 90
> >
> >
> > On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 10:02 AM Igor Podlesny <ceph-u...@poige.ru>
> wrote:
> > > What is your experience?
> > > Does it make sense to use it -- is it solid enough or beta quality
> > > rather (both in terms of stability and performance)?
> > >
> > > I've read it was more or less packaged to work with RHEL. Does it
> > > hold true still?
> > > What's the best way to install it on, say, CentOS or Debian/Ubuntu?
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > ceph-users mailing list
> > > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> > > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEElZWfRQVsNukQFi9Ko80MCbT/An0FAlz6+ocACgkQo80MCbT/
> An28EBAA4FlpRYEhFSWm2dfTdYBfFLNJbLrwyMvXOe22sLHwlz3GWMnY2llJ7nyM
> YAZy0DZGmujoztBos3eR1A/FB22yr6BYPjC9/f/+8vt3TMhxG5Tm0g/XifJSXaJl
> zL8lA3T+XkcMZkphukjhR2BZWioam0ipT07n6+rNdQCaS9/xt7QE7gwWeGQWxKsf
> EDY4XWKjiIvyuK4nt2R1raTl9uaW1FI2qM/UoHWyW+ip86syEC1p1HfqWpeU5Mm2
> TXRgTVRS4tM91GfciwKdCwZIZjT10POyFfk2DHwMA40lUc8cFCyzj3aAkdJp4U4h
> 8Wm0QJBzabcuWHfBBJlWRARSGVXKUx08HM3alatO8vum5WSK2w9l5pgyx5H4jM5+
> 6YABtwvT5lwEiHL9hUoO9HDpyj/IcMzHF5yG5v5PdXCuat7HwNcv6dD2j2dEAgma
> HlLRo84PNeHiIn52jSSFGr4O6MQTYei/VMD2IbrDJzjUOFCUOxdX5WsSeFdhF5Zc
> LW2rcnLiTcRisxiu3MvJI1kUvGFr1GFmjQI/7MeTXiq2bfQh08LUpM6Cz/ch7iUQ
> xo7zUGGuQcOx6iSmagTcMa1QqF8+txCSvCTVvlWdXLAzXsDOJ4mkGe1EWJ2pHjz2
> zBcn25Qfws9DEvEww71a/sKp2tlwnKCZgKXhkIBOKyhU7x1dYOI=
> =I3pv
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
> This e-mail is intended solely for the benefit of the addressee(s) and any
> other named recipient. It is confidential and may contain legally
> privileged or confidential information. If you are not the recipient, any
> use, distribution, disclosure or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. The
> confidentiality and legal privilege attached to this communication is not
> waived or lost by reason of the mistaken transmission or delivery to you.
> If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately.
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to