remapped no longer triggers a health warning in nautilus. Your data is still there, it's just on the wrong OSD if that OSD is still up and running.
Paul -- Paul Emmerich Looking for help with your Ceph cluster? Contact us at https://croit.io croit GmbH Freseniusstr. 31h 81247 München www.croit.io Tel: +49 89 1896585 90 On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 10:48 PM Tarek Zegar <tze...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > For testing purposes I set a bunch of OSD to 0 weight, this correctly > forces Ceph to not use said OSD. I took enough out such that the UP set > only had Pool min size # of OSD (i.e 2 OSD). > > Two Questions: > 1. Why doesn't the acting set eventually match the UP set and simply point > to [6,5] only > 2. Why are none of the PGs marked as undersized and degraded? The data is > only hosted on 2 OSD rather then Pool size (3), I would expect a undersized > warning and degraded for PG with data? > > Example PG: > PG 1.4d active+clean+remapped UP= [6,5] Acting = [6,5,4] > > OSD Tree: > ID CLASS WEIGHT TYPE NAME STATUS REWEIGHT PRI-AFF > -1 0.08817 root default > -3 0.02939 host hostosd1 > 0 hdd 0.00980 osd.0 up 1.00000 1.00000 > 3 hdd 0.00980 osd.3 up 1.00000 1.00000 > 6 hdd 0.00980 osd.6 up 1.00000 1.00000 > -5 0.02939 host hostosd2 > 1 hdd 0.00980 osd.1 up 0 1.00000 > 4 hdd 0.00980 osd.4 up 0 1.00000 > 7 hdd 0.00980 osd.7 up 0 1.00000 > -7 0.02939 host hostosd3 > 2 hdd 0.00980 osd.2 up 1.00000 1.00000 > 5 hdd 0.00980 osd.5 up 1.00000 1.00000 > 8 hdd 0.00980 osd.8 up 0 1.00000 > > > > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
