On Mon, 22 Apr 2019, 22:20 Gregory Farnum, <gfar...@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Apr 20, 2019 at 9:29 AM Igor Podlesny <ceph-u...@poige.ru> wrote:
> >
> > I remember seeing reports in regards but it's being a while now.
> > Can anyone tell?
>
> No, this hasn't changed. It's unlikely it ever will; I think NFS
> resolved the issue but it took a lot of ridiculous workarounds and
> imposes a permanent memory cost on the client.
>

On the other hand, we've been running osds and local kernel mounts through
some ior stress testing and managed to lock up only one node, only once
(and that was with a 2TB shared output file).

Maybe the necessary memory pressure conditions get less likely as the
number of clients and osds gets larger? (i.e. it's probably easy to trigger
with one single node/osd because all IO is local, but for large clusters
most IO is remote).

.. Dan


-Greg
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to