Yea, that was a cluster created during firefly... Wish there was a good article on the naming and use of these, or perhaps a way I could make sure they are not used before deleting them. I know RGW will recreate anything it uses, but I don’t want to lose data because I wanted a clean system.
-Brent -----Original Message----- From: Gregory Farnum <gfar...@redhat.com> Sent: Monday, April 15, 2019 5:37 PM To: Brent Kennedy <bkenn...@cfl.rr.com> Cc: Ceph Users <ceph-users@lists.ceph.com> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Default Pools On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 1:52 PM Brent Kennedy <bkenn...@cfl.rr.com> wrote: > > I was looking around the web for the reason for some of the default pools in > Ceph and I cant find anything concrete. Here is our list, some show no use > at all. Can any of these be deleted ( or is there an article my googlefu > failed to find that covers the default pools? > > We only use buckets, so I took out .rgw.buckets, .users and > .rgw.buckets.index… > > Name > .log > .rgw.root > .rgw.gc > .rgw.control > .rgw > .users.uid > .users.email > .rgw.buckets.extra > default.rgw.control > default.rgw.meta > default.rgw.log > default.rgw.buckets.non-ec All of these are created by RGW when you run it, not by the core Ceph system. I think they're all used (although they may report sizes of 0, as they mostly make use of omap). > metadata Except this one used to be created-by-default for CephFS metadata, but that hasn't been true in many releases. So I guess you're looking at an old cluster? (In which case it's *possible* some of those RGW pools are also unused now but were needed in the past; I haven't kept good track of them.) -Greg _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
