I am looking one problematic pg on my disaster scenario and look at bellow :
root@monitor~# ceph pg ls-by-pool cinder_sata | grep 5.5b7 5.5b7 26911 29 53851 107644 29 112248188928 53258 53258 active+recovering+undersized+degraded+remapped 2019-03-11 14:05:29.857657 95096'33589806 95169:37258027 [96,47,38] 96 [154] 15465986'27640790 2019-01-21 19:36:06.645070 65986'27640790 2019-01-21 19:36:06.645070 My problematic pg has 3 osds acting and one another osd acting primary : up up_primary acting acting_primary 9 [96,47,38] 96 [154] 154 If I compare with a good one we look this : up_primary acting acting_primary 85 [85,102,143] 85 The problematic pg scenario is a normal thing ? Regards, Fabio Abreu On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 9:01 AM David Turner <drakonst...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ceph has been getting better and better about prioritizing this sorry of > recovery, but free of those optimizations are in Jewel, which had been out > of the support cycle for about a year. You should look into upgrading to > mimic where you should see a pretty good improvement on this sorry of > prioritization. > > On Sat, Mar 9, 2019, 3:10 PM Fabio Abreu <fabioabreur...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> HI Everybody, >> >> I have a doubt about degraded objects in the Jewel 10.2.7 version, can I >> priorize the degraded objects than misplaced? >> >> I asking this because I try simulate a disaster recovery scenario. >> >> >> Thanks and best regards, >> Fabio Abreu Reis >> http://fajlinux.com.br >> *Tel : *+55 21 98244-0161 >> *Skype : *fabioabreureis >> _______________________________________________ >> ceph-users mailing list >> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >> > -- Atenciosamente, Fabio Abreu Reis http://fajlinux.com.br *Tel : *+55 21 98244-0161 *Skype : *fabioabreureis
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
