Well as you mentioned Journals I guess you was using filestore in your test?
You could go down the route of bluestore and put the WAL + DB onto the SSD and the bluestore data onto the HD, you should notice an increase in performance over both methods you have tried on filestore. On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 12:45 PM <dave.c...@dell.com> wrote: > Thanks Merrick! > > > > I checked with Intel spec [1], the performance Intel said is, > > > > · Sequential Read (up to) 500 MB/s > > · Sequential Write (up to) 330 MB/s > > · Random Read (100% Span) 72000 IOPS > > · Random Write (100% Span) 20000 IOPS > > > > I think these indicator should be must better than general HDD, and I have > run read/write commands with “rados bench” respectively, there should be > some difference. > > > > And is there any kinds of configuration that could give us any performance > gain with this SSD (Intel S4500)? > > > > [1] > https://ark.intel.com/products/120521/Intel-SSD-DC-S4500-Series-480GB-2-5in-SATA-6Gb-s-3D1-TLC- > > > > Best Regards, > > Dave Chen > > > > *From:* Ashley Merrick <singap...@amerrick.co.uk> > *Sent:* Wednesday, November 14, 2018 12:30 PM > *To:* Chen2, Dave > *Cc:* ceph-users > *Subject:* Re: [ceph-users] Benchmark performance when using SSD as the > journal > > > > [EXTERNAL EMAIL] > Please report any suspicious attachments, links, or requests for sensitive > information. > > Only certain SSD's are good for CEPH Journals as can be seen @ > https://www.sebastien-han.fr/blog/2014/10/10/ceph-how-to-test-if-your-ssd-is-suitable-as-a-journal-device/ > > > > The SSD your using isn't listed but doing a quick search online it appears > to be a SSD designed for read workloads as a "upgrade" from a HD so > probably is not designed for the high write requirements a journal demands. > > Therefore when it's been hit by 3 OSD's of workloads your not going to get > much more performance out of it than you would just using the disk as your > seeing. > > > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 12:21 PM <dave.c...@dell.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > We want to compare the performance between HDD partition as the journal > (inline from OSD disk) and SSD partition as the journal, here is what we > have done, we have 3 nodes used as Ceph OSD, each has 3 OSD on it. > Firstly, we created the OSD with journal from OSD partition, and run “rados > bench” utility to test the performance, and then migrate the journal from > HDD to SSD (Intel S4500) and run “rados bench” again, the expected result > is SSD partition should be much better than HDD, but the result shows us > there is nearly no change, > > > > The configuration of Ceph is as below, > > pool size: 3 > > osd size: 3*3 > > pg (pgp) num: 300 > > osd nodes are separated across three different nodes > > rbd image size: 10G (10240M) > > > > The utility I used is, > > rados bench -p rbd $duration write > > rados bench -p rbd $duration seq > > rados bench -p rbd $duration rand > > > > Is there anything wrong from what I did? Could anyone give me some > suggestion? > > > > > > Best Regards, > > Dave Chen > > > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > >
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
