On Tue, Sep 18, 2018, 7:56 PM solarflow99 <solarflo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> thanks for the replies, I don't know that cephFS clients go through the
> MONs, they reach the OSDs directly.  When I mentioned NFS, I meant NFS
> clients (ie. not cephFS clients) This should have been pretty straight
> forward.
> Anyone doing HA on the MONs?  How do you mount the cephFS shares, surely
> you'd have a vip?
>

When you mount cephfs or an RBD (for your NFS case) you provide a list of
monitors. They are, by nature, highly available. They do not rely in any
sort of VIP failover like keepalived or pacemaker.

-Erik

>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 12:37 PM Jean-Charles Lopez <jelo...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> > On Sep 17, 2018, at 16:13, solarflow99 <solarflo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi, I read through the various documentation and had a few questions:
>> >
>> > - From what I understand cephFS clients reach the OSDs directly, does
>> the cluster network need to be opened up as a public network?
>> Client traffic only goes over the public network. Only OSD to OSD traffic
>> (replication, rebalancing, recovery go over the cluster network)
>> >
>> > - Is it still necessary to have a public and cluster network when the
>> using cephFS since the clients all reach the OSD's directly?
>> Separating the network is a plus for troubleshooting and sizing for
>> bandwidth
>> >
>> > - Simplest way to do HA on the mons for providing NFS, etc?
>> Don’t really understand the question (NFS vs CephFS).
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > ceph-users mailing list
>> > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
>> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to